Rolling Meadows Court House
Call or Text Now For Immediate Access To A Lawyer (847) 985-6767
The law offices of Marder and Seidler have been representing clients in the Rolling Meadows Court for 35 years. They are experienced and acquainted in the courthouse proceedings. With offices in Schaumburg since 1978, they have close proximity to Rolling Meadows.
Many of the cases they handle in Rolling Meadows, include the following:
-Criminal cases, including felony and misdemeanor
-DUI
-Suspended Drivers License
-Traffic
-Domestic Battery
-Divorce
-Orders of Protection
-Adoptions
- Expungements
-Juvenile
If you are in need of an experienced lawyer to represent you in Rolling Meadows, contact Marder and Seidler for a free initial and confidential consultation.
Contact Us
Client Reviews:
Cards Accepted
Biz Videos
Biz Express
- Under Illinois state law, the court may grant a custodial parent’s request for relocation only when it is deemed to be in the best interests of the child. Such orders may be issued even if the noncustodial parent objects. In these cases, it falls to the custodial parents to prove that the move is in the child’s best interests. There are a number of factors that the court will consider in determining whether to approve a request for relocation. Under state law, these factors include the following: Whether moving will enhance the child and custodial parent’s quality of life The reason why the custodial parent wishes to move The motive for the noncustodial parent’s objection to the relocation Whether a realistic and reasonable visitation schedule can be reached and implemented The time and cost that will be involved with visitation as a result of the move Furthermore, the court may also take into consideration the distance of the move.
- The new law, which was added to Section 503(n) of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act states: “If the court finds that a companion animal of the parties is a marital asset, it shall allocate the sole or joint ownership of and responsibility for a companion animal of the parties. In issuing an order under this subsection, the court shall take into consideration the well-being of the companion animal. As used in this section, “companion animal” does not include a service animal as defined in Section 2.01c of the Humane Care for Animals Act.” Under this new law, pet owners can expect the court to consider joint or sole ownership of their pet based on the best interests of the pet. It is also possible to work out joint ownership arrangements for the pet that include visitation.
